Let us not call them "Parks" anymore, get serious and just call them forests or sanctuaries
A week ago, there was a news
about connecting Borivili and Thane by a ropeway, and wait where would it rest
on or go through? The hills of Sanjay Gandhi National Park. Sounds crazy and
those of us who know what SGNP is have been left in a state of shock. First you
have plans to cut through the “Park” for a high speed train service, next you
want ropeways and what next? Open it up for “development”?
Mumbai and its ecological
hotspots are under threat, constant threat and in some ways the space crunch
the city faces is also due to its geography. But, the greatness of this city is
also about its geography, the sea one side, the forests and the hills on the
other side, bringing abundant rains, feeding many small rivers and filling up
many natural and man made lakes.
There may be a million
climate change naysayers, but for me having lived here for 25 years, the
climate change is a reality. It doesn’t rain like that anymore …. not the
predictable torrential monsoon showers anymore. Not so cool except for a hot
October or a humid May.
No one seems to mind that
this is happening, and worse that could happen if the western ghats are
disturbed, SGNP encroached and some rivers diverted and a few hills broken.
Last year when the Save Aarey
colony movement hit a high and an uproar to scrap the Mumbai Redevelopment
Plan, the then Municipal Commissioner flippantly said, “what is there in Aarey,
some vegetation. We will develop a garden, make it nice and usable”.
It was a shock, coming from a
learned officer, a top ranking official who would think of nothing about the
number of species an Aarey supports, what a buffer zone to SGNP means and why
the city needs some green spaces. One does understand the city has no space to
expand. That is the nature of Mumbai. That doesn’t mean concretise the city end
to end, grow vertical as much as builders can scale and alter the city’s
geography and may be even destroy a bit of its history.
From the Commissioner’s statement
to the current proposal to carry a ropeway from SGNP, I feel we need to get
serious about our forests. Let us not use this “National Park” nomenclature and
just say it is a forest. It is not meant for recreation, and nothing can be
built there. Just imagine that the SGNP had existed for over 2000 years (the
history we gather from the Kanheri Caves it houses) with all its flora and
fauna, with its caves, natural sources of water and what we see at Borivili is
just tip of a sprawling forest.
The moment we use “Park” it
brings with the word the connotation of man made. Once you make it a human
effort the thought process is it is for “recreation”, and it has to “developed”,
“maintained”. Did we get into the “National Park” business form the US National
Parks system, movement? Whatever it is we should shed that. Simple, call them
sanctuaries, where certain species are earmarked for protection and in other
places forests.
Comments